Cases 31 - 40 of 881,489
Cengage Learning, Inc. et al v. Google LLC
as 1:2024cv04274
Plaintiff:
Cengage Learning, Inc., Bedford, Freeman & Worth Publishing Group, LLC d/b/a Macmillan Learning, Macmillan Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v Johnson
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tajia Johnson
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Oakley-Femlee v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jessie Oakley-Femlee
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Long v. Sweat
as 6:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Natasha Nicole Long
Respondent:
Christe Sweat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Panabaker et al v. Hood River
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Ruston Panabaker, Sheri Panabaker, John J Hutson and others
Defendant:
City of Hood River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCarter v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Timothy McCarter
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Robyn Rosenfield, Dr. Leland Beamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONVENIENCE COLLISION, INC. v. INTREPID INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2024cv02429
Plaintiff:
CONVENIENCE COLLISION, INC.
Defendant:
INTREPID INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
