Cases 81 - 90 of 880,455
DN Tanks Mgmt, LLC et al v. Speedie
as 3:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
DN Tanks Mgmt, LLC, DN Tanks, LLC and DN Tanks, Inc.
Defendant:
Allen M. Speedie
Juan Pablo Chavez v. American Express et al
as 2:2024cv04560
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez and Prince of New York
Defendant:
American Express, High Yield Savings, Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
De La Cruz Martinez v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv50211
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Bobbi Jo Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Cruz Martinez v. Emery
as 3:2024cv50212
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Judge Katherine B. Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mastriano
Defendant:
James Gregory, III, Roland Kuhn, Paul Mazerolle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Semper Foods, LLC v. Jafco Foods, Inc d/b/a Curate Foodservice
as 1:2024mc00233
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re: Jefferson LA Brea D and J Properties, LLC
as 2:2023cv10179
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
BILLINGS CLINIC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
BILLINGS CLINIC, BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL doing business as BEAUMONT HEALTH - FARMINGTON HILLS, CAMDEN-CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as CAMDEN CLARK MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Linse v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Valerie Joy Linse
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
