Contract Cases filed in District of Columbia matching "A. D"
Cases 21 - 30 of 878,845
De Los Santos v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65654
Plaintiff: Richard D. De Los Santos
Defendant: Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fortado et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff: Linda Fortado and Michael Fortado
Defendant: Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02939
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02944
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kumar v. ServPro Industries, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03986
Plaintiff: Shalabh Kumar
Defendant: ServPro Industries, LLC, QCII, LLC d/b/a ServPro of Davenport/Bettendorf and ServPro Franchisor, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brightspeed of Southern Alabama, LLC v. City of Foley et al
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: Brightspeed of Southern Alabama, LLC
Defendant: City of Foley and Utilities Board of the City of Foley, Alabama d/b/a Riviera Utilities
Blevins v. Arora et al
as 5:2024cv02954
Plaintiff: Kenneth Blevins
Defendant: Nikesh Arora, Nir Zuk, Aparna Bawa and others
Whitfield v. Parmar
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff: Steven Whitfield
Defendant: Dr. Ashok Parmar individually Doing business as Bakersfield Central Pain Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01391
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Green v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00576
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?