Cases 31 - 40 of 16,115
Seth Schmidt v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11160
Plaintiff:
SETH SCHMIDT
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S. INC
USSERY v. HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
DONALD J USSERY, JR
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA and MARK DANIEL HEBERLIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDaniels v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
John McDaniels
Defendant:
Diamondback Energy, Inc., Travis D. Stice, Vincent K. Brooks and others
Stephen Cribb v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11147
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN CRIBB
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and DISNEY VACATION CLUB MANAGEMENT, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Turner v. HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 4:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Keisha Marie Turner
Defendant:
HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Adam Pajer v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11146
Plaintiff:
ADAM PAJER
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS US, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Steven Gibbons v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11148
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GIBBONS
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S. INC
Matthew Peterson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 24-1585
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PETERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART, DARRYL HOUSTON, HUGH WALSH and others
Williams v. City of Houston
as 4:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Armando Williams
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
