First Circuit Torts - Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,092
Deng et al v. Kudos Innovations, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10845
Plaintiff:
Kimmy Deng and EKATERINA KIM
Defendant:
Kudos Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A. v. Ortega et al
as 4:2024cv40039
Plaintiff:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A.
Defendant:
Luis Ortega, Rasim Ahmadov and Fastfix LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mickendrow v. Enstar (US) Inc.
as 1:2024cv10586
Plaintiff:
Brian Mickendrow
Defendant:
Enstar (US) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Silva et al v. Truist Bank
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mark Silva and Lauren Damiani
Defendant:
Truist Bank and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Halks v. The Kindley Firm, APC et al
as 1:2024cv10201
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Halks
Defendant:
The Kindley Firm, APC, George Kindley and Hamparyan Personal Injury Lawyers, APC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
O'Connor et al v. Sutter Health et al
as 1:2024cv10022
Plaintiff:
Catherine O'Connor and Frank Coats
Defendant:
Sutter Health, Welltok, Inc., Progress Software Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mercado v. Carrington et al
as 1:2024cv10003
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mercado
Defendant:
Alfred Carrington and Vida Carrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Williams
as 1:2023cv13191
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Williams
Defendant:
Rayon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
Depoian v. Berger
as 1:2023cv13063
Plaintiff:
Sarah Depoian
Defendant:
Merle Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
