First Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 5,255
Watson v. Fasano
as 23-1635
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAWRENCE BYRON WATSON
Respondent / Appellee:
EDWARD J. DOLAN, Commissioner of Probation, ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, Attorney General and DIANE FASANO, Commissioner of Probation
Silva-Prentice v. Gray
as 1:2023cv11813
Petitioner:
Robert Silva-Prentice
Respondent:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. KANE
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
MARK R JORDAN
Respondent:
SCOTT KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hem v. Suffolk County House of Correction
as 1:2023cv11767
Petitioner:
Timmy Hem
Respondent:
Suffolk County House of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Pierre-Mike et al
as 1:2023cv11665
Petitioner:
Albert Gonzalez
Respondent:
Janaya Pierre-Mike and Ricardo R. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv11660
Petitioner:
Steven L Smith
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. US Department of Justice
as 1:2023cv00363
Petitioner:
Adam Scott
Respondent:
US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kaddy v. State of New Hampshire Hospital
as 1:2023cv00361
Petitioner:
Anthony J. Kaddy
Respondent:
State of New Hampshire Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Munir v. Suttell
as 23-1598
Petitioner / Appellant:
HASIM MUNIR
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL A. SUTTELL, Chief Justice of the Rhode Island Supreme Court
Saint-Vil v. Alves
as 23-1571
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNAVON SAINT-VIL
Respondent / Appellee:
NELSON ALVES, MCI Norfolk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
