Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 161 - 170 of 22,899
Dennard v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00152
Plaintiff: Virgil Dennard
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
Poux v. Kimberly
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff: Patrick Jerome Poux
Defendant: M Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. McClain et al
as 4:2024cv00281
Plaintiff: Tony Jerrod Collins
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner: George Boone, Jr.
Respondent: State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00267
Petitioner: Candice Cherie Martin
Respondent: Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mensah v. Warden Kimberly Neely
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner: Deborah Mensah
Respondent: Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff: Jamie Christopher May
Defendant: TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?