Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 22,852
Hornbuckle v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv08006
Petitioner:
John Hornbuckle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martin v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Candice Cherie Martin
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mensah v. Warden Kimberly Neely
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Deborah Mensah
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Hamm et al
as 6:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Curtis Caldwell
Defendant:
John Hamm, Dr. Thomas, Scotty Schaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erramraju v. Blount County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Ramaraju Rom Erramraju
Defendant:
Blount County Jail, Mark Moon, Blount County Jail Medical Infirmary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera-Garcia v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Abigal Rivera-Garcia
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henley v. Calloway et al
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Nikita Roland Henley
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Martin et al
as 5:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jason Everett Moore
Defendant:
Mark Martin, Edward Lewter, Kevin Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilkes v. Johnson et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Randall Wilkes
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell and Rick Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
