Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 22,852
Bailey v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Randolph County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Rogers (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Captain Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
Pettway v. McClain et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Mikel Dewayne Pettway
Defendant:
Captain Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennard v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Virgil Dennard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poux v. Kimberly
as 1:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jerome Poux
Defendant:
M Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. McClain et al
as 4:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Tony Jerrod Collins
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
