US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 115,267
Alto Asset Company 4, LLC v. Davis
as 1:2024cv01998
Plaintiff: Alto Asset Company 4, LLC
Defendant: Lakaii Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pi v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02001
Plaintiff: Tulsi Pi
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01993
Plaintiff: Walter Thomas and Desmond Bailey
Defendant: Victor Hill and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01988
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
David v. Hydrick et al
as 1:2024cv02003
Plaintiff: Deonta David
Defendant: Judge Stacey K. Hydrick, P.D. Scott W. DePlonty, Judge Courtney L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. United States
as 1:2024cv01999
Plaintiff: Trudy Sherman
Defendant: United States
Acevedo v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01987
Plaintiff: Juan Acevedo
Defendant: Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Aviles v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01997
Plaintiff: Omar Aviles
Defendant: Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?