D.C. Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,468
TUCKER v. LANDERKIN et al
as 1:2020cv01379
Defendant:
LANDERKIN, E. PERRY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
MARCUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. SHELLEY et al
as 1:2020cv01355
Defendant:
KATHLEEN WACH, UNITED STATES, ANTHONY F. SHELLEY
and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv01352
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CLARKE et al
as 1:2020cv01267
Defendant:
WALLENS RIDGE STATE PRISON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, DAVID ZOOK
and others
Plaintiff:
MILTON BROWN
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2020cv01257
Defendant:
K. CROWDER, B. J. RAVIZEE, HAROLD W. CLARKE
and others
Plaintiff:
MILTON BROWN
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv01252
Defendant:
MILLER AND CHEVALIER CHARTERED, MARIA JONES, MARY LOU SOLLER
and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JEROME MILLS
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BERNIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01250
Plaintiff:
JEAN BERNIER
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Tort Claims Act
DALE v. UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
as 1:2020cv01248
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE DALE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
COBBLE v. U.S COURT OF APPEALS et al
as 1:2020cv01222
Defendant:
U.S. MAGISTRATE, U.S COURT OF APPEALS, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
HINTON v. POPPIN
as 1:2020cv01178
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HINTON
Defendant:
DARREN POPPIN
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
