D.C. Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 8,343
BRAXTON v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv01717
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Respondent:
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRAXTON v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv01718
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. FBI et al
as 1:2023cv01640
Plaintiff:
VINCENT WILSON
Defendant:
FBI, KERRY, FACEBOOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOBLE v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant:
SCOTT HARRIS, CARINA LAGUZZI, DENNIS MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DESENBERG v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
ROGER MARX DESENBERG
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EISENMANN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
GARY LANE EISENMANN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOSTER v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FOSTER
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOURNING v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LEE MOURNING
Defendant:
JOHN BROWN, HANS FRANK, MILDRED SUSAN BATEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antoine Hill-El v. USA
as 23-5114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Antoine Martwain Hill-El
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
