D.C. Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 8,343
David Rudometkin v. Christine Wormuth
as 23-5181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee:
Christine E. Wormuth, in her capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army
David Rudometkin v. USA
as 23-5180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
BENJAMIN v. COLBERT et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
RILEY BENJAMIN
Defendant:
NICOLE COLBERT, JIMMIE ALLEN and JACQUELINE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Religion
DESIR v. NEW YORK STATE D.O.C.C.S
as 1:2023cv02366
Plaintiff:
STIVENSON DESIR
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE D.O.C.C.S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02367
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02311
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL K. HILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON BOUNDARIES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACK v. JACK et al
as 1:2023cv02303
Petitioner:
JOHN JACK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF WASHINGTON, OFFICE OF THE BISHIP - DIOCESE OF TEXARKANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Anthony Braxton v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia
as 23-7102
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Respondent / Appellee:
Superior Court of the District of Columbia
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02223
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
