D.C. Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 8,343
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02224
Petitioner:
RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NERIO v. INTERNAL HOUSE-TEXAS
as 1:2023cv02179
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD ANTHONY NERIO
Defendant:
INTERNAL HOUSE-TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEYS v. CONNORS et al
as 1:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
CLAY KEYS
Defendant:
IAN CONNORS, JOHN DOES 1-2, HERIBERTO TELLEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZIMMERMAN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
TERRY GEORGE ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WHITEHEAD v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv02121
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE and DAVID S. GOODER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Braxton v. Marnitta King
as 23-7098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
Marnitta L. King
Anthony Braxton v. DC
as 23-7096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
