D.C. Circuit Cases

Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 76,767
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5120
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Seth Hettena v. CIA
as 24-5119
Plaintiff: Seth Hettena
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff: MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant: JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Compania Cervecera de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. NLRB
as 24-1104
Petitioner: Compania Cervecera de Puerto Rico, Inc.
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
WILSON v. LYFT, INC.
as 1:2024cv01250
Plaintiff: TRECOLIA WILSON
Defendant: LYFT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2024cv01247
Plaintiff: PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01258
Plaintiff: ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER, COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GLEN FALLS HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. XAVIER BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01259
Plaintiff: STANFORD HEALTH CARE, ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as ALAMEDA HOSPITAL doing business as HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION doing business as CHINESE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01257
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01256
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?