US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Cases 31 - 40 of 43,794
Raynor et al v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv01221
Defendant:
McGaunclin and Maldonado
Plaintiff:
James Raynor and James Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniska v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01225
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Scott Howard Daniska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Halliday v. Target Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv01211
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Target Enterprise, Inc. and Target Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janet Halliday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris v. Clough et al
as 3:2024cv01213
Defendant:
Terri Bachlechner, Paul V. Carty, Olga Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Letisha L Harris
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Blauvelt v. Bethune
as 3:2024cv01217
Defendant:
Christopher Bethune
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Blauvelt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanley v. Macierowski et al
as 3:2024cv01219
Defendant:
Anthony Spinella, Jennifer Macierowski and Adam B. Scott
Plaintiff:
Steven K. Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McCarthy v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01214
Petitioner:
John J. McCarthy
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
