District Court Cases in Connecticut
Cases 81 - 90 of 43,412
Markham v. Owusu et al
as 3:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
James Markham
Defendant:
George Owusu and Sambenny Logistics Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hines et al v. Damhas et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shameka Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Damhas, Earl Given, 915 Lafayette Blv Room 400 06604 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Reese v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2024cv00801
Petitioner:
Reginald J. Reese, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Newkirk v. Wong et al
as 3:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Newkirk, Jr.
Defendant:
Danielle Wong, Paul Hammick, Zackary Klomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Standard Fire Insurance Company et al v. Atlantic Detroit Diesel Allison, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Standard Fire Insurance Company and Roni Mizrahi
Defendant:
Atlantic Detroit Diesel Allison, Inc and MarineMax Northeast, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
White v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Kareem White
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
