District Court Cases in Connecticut
Cases 121 - 130 of 43,534
Baker v. Town of Hamden et al
as 3:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Patrick Baker
Defendant:
Town of Hamden, Veterinary Associates of Derby LLC, Central Hospital for Veterinary Medicine, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bennings et al v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00877
Petitioner:
Antonio Bennings and Addison Bennings
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manson v. Caron et al
as 3:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
James Manson
Defendant:
Caron, Ogando and Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Wilkey et al
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Keenan Campbell
Defendant:
Wilkey, Jackson, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Spotten et al
as 3:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Mayo
Defendant:
Kerri Spotten, Jane Doe, Marissa Goldberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
Ronald Javon Boyd
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acuren Inspection, Inc. v. Dillon et al
as 3:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Acuren Inspection, Inc.
Defendant:
Ryan Dillon, Jesus Villalta, Brian Perry and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Ayavaca et al
as 3:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Elvis Gustavo Ayavaca and Latin Escape Bar & Restaurant LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Unauthorized reception of signal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
