Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 879
ORTIZ v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv02005
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SHANKAR v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2020cv00640
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN SHANKAR
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jacob et al v. Reading, Blue Mountain and Northern Railroad Company et al
as 3:2020cv00087
Defendant:
International Paper Company and Reading, Blue Mountain and Northern Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Brent Jacob and Cari Jacob
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
JONES v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv05640
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
LUTHER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
as 3:2019cv00138
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Plaintiff:
TYLOR LUTHER
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Leister v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01471
Defendant:
Hallcon, INC and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Plaintiff:
Justin Leister
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
GRAY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2019cv00894
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. GRAY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
DIGIORGIO v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv02181
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DIGIORGIO
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MASTROCOLA et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv01970
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MASTROCOLA and KATHLEEN MASTROCOLA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DIPAOLA v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv01374
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DIPAOLA
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
