Third Circuit Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 756,931
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WILLIAMS v. WALKER et al
as 2:2025cv00203
Petitioner:
HENRY DION WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TINA WALKER and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EARLY v. WALKER et al
as 2:2025cv00171
Plaintiff:
JACQUES EARLY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER REGINA, KEITH MATAYISIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MCGUIRE v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2025cv00201
Plaintiff:
ERIC MCGUIRE
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ALVARADO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2025cv00199
Plaintiff:
APRIL MARIE ALVARADO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. PetSmart, LLC
as 1:2025cv00267
Plaintiff:
Carmella Jones
Defendant:
PetSmart, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bova Jr v. Bernardyn
as 3:2025cv00257
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Bova Jr
Defendant:
Mark Bernardyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bova v. Sajone et al
as 3:2025cv00258
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Bova, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Sajone and Cathy Moffat Sajone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Sweeney et al
as 3:2025cv00259
Plaintiff:
Lamar A. Williams
Defendant:
Kevin Robert Sweeney, James Petrucci, James Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.