Third Circuit Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 743,095
BONILLA v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03351
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
GABRIELA BONILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KIRKLAND v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03352
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
DANNY JO KIRKLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
GRUNDHOEFER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03355
Plaintiff:
DOREEN GRUNDHOEFER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHUCK v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03328
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
LUCILLE SHUCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BURGESS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03354
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
MARLIN BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRANDELL v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03353
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE CRANDELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SUDLER et al v. UNITED PARKS & RESORTS INC.
as 2:2024cv03322
Plaintiff:
REGINA SUDLER, Z.S., CHARLES FITZGERALD and others
Defendant:
UNITED PARKS & RESORTS INC. doing business as SESAME PLACE PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03325
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
