US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,105
FREEMAN v. KIM et al
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. FREEMAN
Defendant:
SGT. KIM, SGT. LAURA and LUETENANT KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. DEJOY
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JONES
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BLAKELY v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Larry Gray Blakley, Sr.
Defendant:
WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, SERGEANT Joshua Mabe, Deputy Cody Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
R.M. et al v. MINA CHARTER SCHOOL OF LEE COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Rylee Ann Holmes, Dawn Rachell Henderson and R.M.
Defendant:
MINA Charter School of Lee County, MINA Charter School of Lee County Board of Directors, Dr. Shawn Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TEASLEY v. O'BRIEN
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
ELIZABETH O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices
GLENN v. GLADSEN
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant:
STEVEN GLADSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
