North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 111 - 120 of 30,363
Navarro-Melendez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00102
Petitioner: Oscar Orlando Navarro-Melendez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sandoval v. USA
as 3:2024cv00372
Petitioner: Jaime Sandoval
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00374
Petitioner: Marvin Maurice Williams
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Shook v. McNally et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff: Jesse L. Shook
Defendant: Charles J. McNally, Norma Biddix and Mike Slagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWINSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00304
Petitioner: CHARLES ANTHONY SWINSON, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rhinehardt v. Moore et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff: Tyree Rhinehardt
Defendant: D. F. Moore, AJ Osmer and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2024hc02077
Petitioner: Wayne Porter
Respondent: Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ali v. Sledge et al
as 5:2024ct03080
Plaintiff: Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant: Wendy Sledge, Kenneth Washington, William Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024ct03081
Plaintiff: Colell B. Steele and Colell Barion Steele
Defendant: North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womble v. Smith et al
as 5:2024ct03078
Plaintiff: Edward Lamont Womble
Defendant: Domenick Smith, Lt. Renita Summers, John R. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?