District Court Cases in North Carolina
Cases 121 - 130 of 87,976
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
CHAPPELLE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
RONDA CHAPPELLE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Casper v. USA
as 3:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
John M. Casper
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hall v. USA
as 3:2024cv00569
Petitioner:
Marc Pierre Hall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McClellan v. USA
as 3:2024cv00568
Petitioner:
Tamara Devonna McClellan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HOOVER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00497
Petitioner:
DEQUAN AHMAD HOOVER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Subway IP LLC, Doctor's Associates, LLC v. 706 Peace, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Subway IP LLC, Doctor's Associates, LLC
Defendant:
706 Peace, LLC and Imad Sider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
The Board of Education for The Public Schools of Robeson County v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
The Board of Education for The Public Schools of Robeson County
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Payments, Inc., Siculus, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ennis v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sandre Ennis
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., Crown FDO L.L.C., Asbury Automotive North Carolina Dealership Holdings L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carraway v. Fields et al
as 5:2024ct03153
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Carraway, II
Defendant:
Lt. R. Fields, Officer J. Lane, Sgt. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
