US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cases 201 - 210 of 68,587
Cooper v. Med Staff of RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Med Staff of RRJ, Dental at RRJ and Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Herber Otoniel Luna Contreras
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bedra et al v. Oak Grove Technologies, LLC
as 1:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Frank Bedra and Kevin Rosado
Defendant:
Oak Grove Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hodges v. Beo
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hodges
Defendant:
Brittney Lynn Beo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Flywyld Aviation, LLC v. U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Flywyld Aviation, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. Loudoun County School Board et al
as 1:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Tonya Smith
Defendant:
Loudoun County School Board and Daniel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoballah v. Beason
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Youssef Hoballah
Defendant:
Christopher Beason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
