US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cases 71 - 80 of 68,613
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemens v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Charles Clemens
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Smith v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Virginia Pool Services Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Brayden R Ward
Defendant:
Virginia Pool Services Inc., Pool Services of Virginia, LLC and Diane I Vermillion
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
AMR Resources, LLC v. Ashford Leebcor Enterprises V, LLC
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
AMR Resources, LLC doing business as Multiband Global
Defendant:
Ashford Leebcor Enterprises V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bran v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Jose Armando Bran
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Russell Steven Jones
Defendant:
Kiara Jones and Oast & Taylor, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
