US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 905
Lawson v. City of St Albans, WV et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Reginald Craig Lawson
Defendant:
City of St Albans, WV, Kanawah County, WV and State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jarrell v. Dyer
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Jarrell
Defendant:
Tom Dyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hanson v. Goodman
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Wesley Hanson
Defendant:
Senior Trooper D.M. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disablities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disablities Act
State of West Virginia v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Emmanuel Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
King v. Chronister et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Cathy King
Defendant:
N. Chronister, Berkeley County Sheriff's Department, Berkeley County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Dankwa et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brent Clark
Defendant:
Doctor Vibeke Dankwa and Patricia Corbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
