Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 66,582
Cardenas v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00443
Petitioner:
Isaac Cardenas
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Darryl Glenn Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Escamilla v. Judge Medrano
as 3:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jorge Melenudo Escamilla
Respondent:
Judge Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otis v. Lumpkin
as 24-40297
Petitioner:
Kerron L. Otis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jenkins v. Tyroch et al
as 6:2024cv00224
Petitioner:
Christopher Jenkins
Respondent:
Melissa Tyroch and Steve Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aragones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Nelson Aragones
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 24-40307
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1072
as 3:2024cv01072
Petitioner:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Respondent:
FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1072
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Hamilton
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hurley v. TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Freddy Hurley
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
