US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Cases 71 - 80 of 21,581
Jefferson v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Mikese Jefferson
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Morgan et al
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
John P Morgan
Defendant:
Jeffrey T Oglesbee and Feliciana Lopez Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Barnette v. Splash Superpools, Ltd. et al
as 3:2024cv00261
Defendant:
Carson Barnette, Splash Superpools, LTD, Penn Entertainment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Offord v. Ace American Insurance Company, et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Johnny Offord, Jr.
Defendant:
Pierre Walker, Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Thompson v. Mason et al
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Thompson
Defendant:
Christopher A. Mason, Jarrett P. Ambeau, Breazeale, Sachse, & Wilson, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Heavenly Haven Care Services, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Phil Scott
Defendant:
Heavenly Haven Care Services, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boyd v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Boyd
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Guirard et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Guirard and Keely R. Guirard
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
United States of America v. $306,741.00 in US Currency
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$306,741.00 in US Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
