Southern District of Mississippi Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 34,741
Surrena v. Adams County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2019cv00122
Defendant: Kevin Bailey, Tony Nichols, Boddy Powell and others
Plaintiff: Toby Surrena
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bringas v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00014
Defendant: Mark Ien, Ms. Unknown Johnson, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff: Octavio Bringas
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00119
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Violation of Civil Rights
Jones v. Mississippi
as 3:2019cv00117
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Mississippi
Plaintiff: Darius Jones
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00013
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc., Doe Defendants 1-100
Plaintiff: Bobbie Jean Hall
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Rush v. Microsoft Corporation
as 3:2019cv00116
Plaintiff: Zorri N. Rush
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00022
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Johnson v. PNK Vicksburg, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00012
Defendant: John Does 1-10, PNK Vicksburg, LLC
Plaintiff: Samuel Johnson
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
McCarthy v. DSLD Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00047
Plaintiff: Emma R. McCarthy
Defendant: DSLD Mortgage, LLC, DSLD Homes (Gulf Coast), LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Patterson v. Heritage Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00048
Defendant: Heritage Properties, Inc., John and Jane Does A, B, C, and D
Plaintiff: John M. Patterson
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?