Southern District of Mississippi Cases

Cases filed


Cases 41 - 50 of 34,721
Mugan v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00108
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Allan Charles Mugan
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00107
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00097
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
La Michoacana Meat Market TM Holdings, LLC v. Pineda et al
as 1:2019cv00039
Defendant: Ramon Pineda, La Michoacana Grocery LLC, Rene Pineda and others
Plaintiff: La Michoacana Meat Market TM Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Rush v. Wells Fargo
as 3:2019cv00095
Plaintiff: Zorri N. Rush
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Venezia v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2019cv00019
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Plaintiff: Chad Joseph Venezia
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrell v. Brazier et al
as 3:2019cv00099
Defendant: Nurse Chrislind Charezenk, Nurse Practitioner Unknown King, CC and others
Plaintiff: Tyrone Burrell
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Venezia v. Garner et al
as 2:2019cv00018
Defendant: John Doe, Keith Garner, Investigator Roland Arnald and others
Plaintiff: Chad Joseph Venezia
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv00102
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Petitioner: Tyrone Anderson
Respondent: Warden Rivers
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rush v. McDonald Law Firm
as 3:2019cv00096
Defendant: McDonald Law Firm
Plaintiff: Zorri N. Rush
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Other Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?