Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 39,738
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Robertson
Defendant:
David Guteriz and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Bulls v. TDCJ
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bulls
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. John Does and Jane Does James V. Allred Unit et al
as 7:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Garrison
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does James V. Allred Unit, John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit, John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcox v. Unknown Officers et al
as 4:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Adam James Wilcox
Defendant:
Unknown Officers, Harris Health and JPS Booking
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Risperdaul
as 9:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ryan Clark Ross
Defendant:
Risperdaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennings v. Ward County
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Prince George Crowling Jennings
Defendant:
Ward County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
