Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 39,730
Broussard v. Gaido
as 4:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Ardis Broussard
Defendant:
Judge Kathryn Colleen Gaido
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Disciplinary Dept. of TDCJ
as 5:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Disciplinary Dept. of TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs, Sr. v. Lumpkin et al.
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
James Tyrone Riggs, Sr
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin, Chairman David G. Gutierrez, Parole Boardmember Elodia Brito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Reynolds and Ofc. FNU Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bello v. USA
as 4:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Olamide Olatayo Bello
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kopatz v. John Doe, UTMB-Telford Unit et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Brian Kopatz
Defendant:
John Doe, UTMB-Telford Unit, John Doe, UCC-Telford Unit, Brandy Curl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deary v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Reginald Deary
Defendant:
B. Collier, B. Reitsma, T. Vitolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Mikeska et al
as 3:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stone
Defendant:
Anton Mikeska and Tow Pro Wreckage Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pippins v. Rasco et al
as 3:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Pippins
Defendant:
Richardson Q Rasco, Steven Cliften and Felicia Pitre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Nue, et al.
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Orenthial Jamal Bell
Defendant:
Olivia Nue, Lt. David Walters #217, Sgt. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
