Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 39,756
Harp v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Levi Harp
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Houston
as 4:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Armando Williams
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. US Postal Employees et al
as 3:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson and Ronald Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
US Postal Employees and Securus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayward v. Harris County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv01327
Plaintiff:
Glen Lee Hayward
Defendant:
Harris County Jail, Sargeant T. Pickins and Detention Officer N. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal and Correctional Officer FNU Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Bi-State Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carlisle Washington
Defendant:
Bi-State Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Binion v. Pod Moving & Storage et al
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Seth Binion
Defendant:
Pods Moving & Storage, McKinney P.D., Collin County Criminal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
