Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 17,557
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00123
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Gentry et al v. Tennessee Department of Treasury et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Howard Gentry and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Treasury, David H. Lillard, Jr. and The Nashville Community Bail Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Winningham v. Fentress County et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Trisha Winningham
Defendant:
Fentress County, Michael Reagon, Fast Access Healthcare, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #047 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
John Doe #047
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #048 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
John Doe #048
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01056
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Anemana v. Mayorkas
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anemana
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
