Seventh Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 9,529
Dominguez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01942
Plaintiff:
Byran I. Dominguez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MINGS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
REBECCA J. MINGS and REBECCA JANE MINGS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARTIN JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CARROLL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
STORMI K. CARROLL
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BOISVERT v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOISVERT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DEWITT v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
MARGARET MARIE DEWITT
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ENGLAND v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A.D. ENGLAND
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ENGLAND v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A.D. ENGLAND
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Phillips v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01583
Plaintiff:
Aikaterini Phillips
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
