Seventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 31,308
Brown v. Sullo et al
as 1:2024cv03360
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Brown
Defendant:
G. Sullo, C. Fogg, Sgt. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03329
Plaintiff:
Aileen Robinson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Yolanda Talley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Davis v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03373
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Davis
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
MATHIS v. JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
DAVID MATHIS, JR.
Defendant:
JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as MILLERS MERRY MANOR and MILLERS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRAMER v. QUAKENBUSH
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CRAMER
Defendant:
DENNIS QUAKENBUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Loraine v. Steuben County Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Edward Loraine
Defendant:
Steuben County Sheriff, Braxton Amos, Shane Matchette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Boyer v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc
as 3:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Gregory Boyer
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe v. Richard Macleod, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MARGARET BURKE, TODD SEXTON and RICHARD MACLEOD
Pearl Henyard v. CTA, et al
as 24-1702
Plaintiff:
PEARL HENYARD
Defendant:
CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY and PACE
Johnston v. Epic Systems et al
as 1:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Epic Systems, Gina Appleby, Esther Jiyun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
