US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Other Statutes Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,831
SPORTS TURF NORTHWEST, LLC v. GREENSGROOMER WORLDWIDE, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02183
Plaintiff:
SPORTS TURF NORTHWEST, LLC
Defendant:
GREENSGROOMER WORLDWIDE, INC., MJ GROUP CONSULTING, INC., JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
STEAK N SHAKE ENTERPRISES, INC. et al v. IFOOD, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02131
Plaintiff:
STEAK N SHAKE ENTERPRISES, INC. and STEAK N SHAKE, LLC
Defendant:
IFOOD, INC., SHASHKI K. RATTAN and CHANDRU C. GURNANI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
THOMAS v. STATE OF DANVILLE et al
as 1:2021cv02127
Plaintiff:
BRENDA THOMAS
Defendant:
STATE OF DANVILLE and SHAMEKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VAN AUSDALL & FARRAR, INC. v. DOE
as 1:2021cv01861
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
VAN AUSDALL & FARRAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHREIBER v. VALENTINE & KEBARTAS, LLC
as 3:2021cv00086
Defendant:
VALENTINE & KEBARTAS, LLC
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN SCHREIBER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SALCEDO v. RN STAFF INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01161
Defendant:
ARVIN AMATORIO, MANUEL GARCIA, RAMON VILLEGAS and others
Plaintiff:
PATROCINIO F. SALCEDO and MA. PATROCINIO F. SALCEDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUSBAND v. IMS PRODUCTIONS INC.
as 1:2021cv00964
Defendant:
IMS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HUSBAND
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 3102
AVX CORPORATION v. EBERHART
as 1:2021cv00694
Defendant:
Richard A Eberhart and RICHARD A. EBERHART
Plaintiff:
AVX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARTIN v. KEURIG DR. PEPPER
as 1:2021cv00669
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARTIN
Defendant:
KEURIG DR. PEPPER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
HORTON v. VILLAGE SCOOTERS AND POWERSPORTS et al
as 1:2021cv00616
Defendant:
PATRICK PEMBERTON, VILLAGE SCOOTERS AND POWERSPORTS, RAMONDA PEMERTON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. HORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
