US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 404
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Abrams et al
as 2:2020cv01310
Defendant:
Edward E Abrams, G.E.J. of South Milwaukee, Inc. doing business as Spirits Bar & Grill, EL GEJ of South Milwaukee Inc doing business as Spirits Bar & Grill and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Integral Images, Inc. v. Megababe, LLC
as 2:2020cv00773
Plaintiff:
Integral Images, Inc.
Defendant:
Megababe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Copeland v. Gorilla Fitness LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01766
Defendant:
Margle Media WI LLC, Unincorporated Association of Individuals d/b/a Margle Media and Gorilla Fitness LLC
Plaintiff:
Brett R. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wright et al v. Dean Distributing Inc
as 1:2019cv01647
Defendant:
Dean Distributing, Inc. and Dean Distributing Inc
Plaintiff:
JQ Licensing, LLC, Jon Q. Wright, JQ Licensing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Boehm v. Lazarczyk
as 2:2019cv01039
Defendant:
Chris Lazarczyk
Plaintiff:
Scott Boehm
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
H5G LLC v. RAM Group Inc
as 2:2019cv00982
Defendant:
RAM Group Inc
Plaintiff:
H5G LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Boehm v. Moncher
as 2:2019cv00943
Plaintiff:
Scott Boehm
Defendant:
Richard Moncher
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Thompson v. Frede et al
as 2:2018cv02036
Defendant:
VentureSpace LLC, Encompass Realty LLC, VS Capitol Drive LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory J Thompson and Gregory A Thompson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Matador MKE LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01538
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Sean A Pliss and Matador MKE LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Konda
as 2:2018cv01482
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Llazar Konda
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
