US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,162
Richard v. Lonoke County et al
as 4:2024cv00972
Defendant:
Cabot Police Department, Lonoke County Sheriff Office, Lonoke County and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wynn Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Ferrell v. Pigue
as 3:2024cv00213
Defendant:
Dillon Pigue
Plaintiff:
Ashton R Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Cherokee Nation Businesses LLC et al v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
Cherokee Nation Businesses LLC, Cherokee Nation Entertainment LLC and Jennifer McGill
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00966
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00962
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Cantrell v. James et al
as 4:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Raniqua Cantrell
Defendant:
Patricia Ann James, Lee D Miller, Lennox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
