US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 1,750
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Lee v. Sustainable Forests, LLC. et al
as 4:2023cv04029
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Lee
Defendant:
Sustainable Forests, LLC. and Blue Sky Timber Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kumm v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2023cv05033
Plaintiff:
Billie Kumm
Defendant:
Deputy Hyrum Wheeler, Deputy Don King, Deputy Tyler Kell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R.F. v. Roraback et al
as 6:2023cv06023
Plaintiff:
R. F.
Defendant:
Daniel Roraback, Tanner Campbell, Shawn Hervey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welter et al v. Wilson et al
as 5:2023cv05034
Plaintiff:
Shelby Welter, Dean Welter and Stephanie Hutchins
Defendant:
Detective Janice Wilson and Detective Reid Hudgens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sutton v. Sevier County et al
as 4:2023cv04018
Plaintiff:
James Sutton
Defendant:
Sevier County, Robert Gentry, Wendell Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Herrod v. The 79th Members of Congress
as 4:2023cv04014
Plaintiff:
Frederick Herrod
Defendant:
The 79th Members of Congress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
