US District Court for the District of Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 251
Adams v. Thompson et al
as 0:2022cv03047
Plaintiff:
Oscar Lee Adams
Defendant:
Mark Thompson, Kathleen A. Loomis, County of Hennepin, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whipple v. Johnston
as 0:2022cv02588
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Whipple
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grauberger v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Grauberger
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpsted, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Johnston
as 0:2022cv02013
Plaintiff:
James Allen Martin
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Lindlbauer et al
as 0:2022cv02011
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Brooks
Defendant:
David A. Lindlbauer, Jana Brister-Korby, Charles S. Fai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doranti v. Kniesel et al
as 0:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
Sarprio Doranti
Defendant:
Terry Kniesel, Ann Linkert, Cory Vargason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boots v. Johnson et al
as 0:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
Bill M. Boots
Defendant:
Nathan Johnson, Kevin Carlson, Richard O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grauberger v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2022cv01798
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Grauberger
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpsted, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Moore
as 0:2022cv01629
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Nancy Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Harpstead
as 0:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
Michael Benson
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
