Minnesota Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,471
Jones v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2021cv02580
Plaintiff: Jeffery A. Jones, Jr.
Defendant: City of Minneapolis and Officer Kyle Mader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Person v. Regents for M Health
as 0:2021cv02567
Plaintiff: S. Person
Defendant: Regents for M Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerk King, Inc. v. City of Rochester et al
as 0:2021cv02545
Plaintiff: Jerk King, Inc.
Defendant: City of Rochester and Destination Medical Center Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaskey v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2021cv02503
Plaintiff: Michael Jon Blaskey
Defendant: Sherburne County and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ching v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2021cv02467
Plaintiff: Florine K. Ching
Defendant: City of Minneapolis, Ofc. Neal Walsh and Ofc. Ryan Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tandoh v. United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2021cv02451
Plaintiff: Aaron Okyere Tandoh
Defendant: United States, Ghana, United Kingdom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aery v. North Star Mutual Insurance et al
as 0:2021cv02423
Plaintiff: James Paul Aery
Defendant: North Star Mutual Insurance, Cory Melbo and Jodi Mae St. Peter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ristow v. Peterson et al
as 0:2021cv02405
Plaintiff: Brent A. Ristow
Defendant: Douglas R. Peterson, Thomas H. Boyd, Juan G. Hoyos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ng v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv02404
Plaintiff: Evan Ng
Defendant: Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle and Joan T.A. Gable
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Stallings v. Bittell et al
as 0:2021cv02395
Plaintiff: Jaleel Kevin Stallings
Defendant: Andrew Bittell, Michael Osbeck, Jr., Christopher Cushenbery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?