Minnesota Civil Rights Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 6,963
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Vang v. Grundhofer et al
as 0:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Ching Vang
Defendant:
Alex Grundhofer, Antonio Rulli and Ramsey County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act - Private Entities Definitions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Public Services Discrimination
Vogelpohl v. McLeod County Health and Human Services et al
as 0:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Lora Vogelpohl
Defendant:
McLeod County Health and Human Services and Jodi Harpstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larson v. HCMC et al
as 0:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Richard Larson
Defendant:
HCMC, AMRTC, Mercy Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson v. Zukerberg
as 0:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Zukerberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Regional Supplemental Services Inc et al
as 0:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Johnson, III
Defendant:
Regional Supplemental Services Inc and Management Specialty Services 109 Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
