Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 250
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02227
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jessica Joyal, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2021cv02252
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
Jodie Harpstead, St. Louis County Court, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. DHS-MSOP employees et al.
as 0:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, Nicole Kielty, Jessica Joyal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. United States Navy et al
as 0:2021cv02184
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
United States Navy and Carlton County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02179
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jeremy Wouri, Sue Swansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. St. Louis County District Court et al
as 0:2021cv02137
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
St. Louis County District Court, Erok Skon, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McHorse v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Bradly Allen McHorse
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services and Minnesota Security Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2021cv02099
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, St. Louis County & Court, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02044
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, David Miles, Steve Sajdek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv02015
Plaintiff:
Darrell Prouty
Defendant:
State of Minnesota and Gabriel Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
