Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 251 - 260 of 5,669
Muhammad v. USA
as 0:2023cv02138
Petitioner:
Musalleh Waheed Muhammad
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Morrow v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02137
Petitioner:
Dale Dexter Morrow, Jr.
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nelson v. Ellison et al
as 0:2023cv02122
Plaintiff:
Chad Nicholas Nelson
Defendant:
Keith Ellison, Minnesota District Judges Association, Authors of the Trial Handbook For Minnesota Lawyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daywitt v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2023cv02111
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steven Daywitt
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead and Nancy Johnston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Daywitt et al v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2023cv02110
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steven Daywitt, Joseph Franciosa Thomas, Kenneth Gernard Parks and others
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston, Jannine Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Spigelman v. Langseth
as 0:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Joel Spigelman
Defendant:
Langseth, Linb Labatory and Lt. Langseth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Segal
as 0:2023cv02062
Petitioner:
Palmira Garcia
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Durell v. Kensy et al
as 0:2023cv02067
Plaintiff:
Dan E. Durell
Defendant:
Matt Kensy, Johnson and DeRungs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unpradit v. USA
as 0:2023cv02049
Petitioner:
Pawinee Unpradit
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Graham v. Gilley
as 0:2023cv02036
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
Warden John Gilley and John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
