US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,956
McKinney v. O'Donnell
as 4:2024cv04131
Respondent:
Warden O'Donnell
Petitioner:
Brad McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. O'Donnell
as 4:2024cv04132
Petitioner:
Cordell Wilson
Defendant:
Warden O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Tobin et al
as 4:2024cv04134
Defendant:
Major Nixon, Cook, R. Rohwere Tinimex and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haugan v. Padilla et al
as 4:2024cv04133
Defendant:
Kellie Wasko and Angel Luis Padilla
Plaintiff:
Matthew Haugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaBatte v. Gangle et al
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Brendan LaBatte
Defendant:
Karen Gangle, Judges for SWO Tribal Court, Hon Michael Swallow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hoyt v. Pennington County Jail
as 5:2024cv05053
Petitioner:
John Hoyt
Respondent:
Pennington County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
East Loop Sand Co., Inc. v. TAK Communications WI, LLC
as 4:2024cv04129
Defendant:
TAK Communications WI, LLC
Plaintiff:
East Loop Sand Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Becerra et al
as 4:2024cv04130
Defendant:
Roselyn Tso, Xavier Becerra and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy
Mitchell v. Frank Winston Crum Insurance et al
as 5:2024cv05052
Defendant:
Frank Winston Crum Insurance and CCMSI
Plaintiff:
Lea Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pinkelman v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2024cv04128
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Jason Pinkelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
