Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 94,866
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Charles David Coker
Respondent:
T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Riley v. Prudhle
as 2:2024cv01363
Petitioner:
Rico Lyntice Riley
Respondent:
Prudhle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gapasin v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2024cv00897
Petitioner:
Richard Gaspin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden CoreCivic C. Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eberhardt v. McMahill et al
as 2:2024cv00901
Petitioner:
Randy Eberhardt
Respondent:
Kevin McMahill and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Martin v. Price
as 1:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Robert E Martin
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jack Benjamin Hessiani v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01034
Petitioner:
Jack Benjamin Hessiani
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Javier Pellecer v. S. Smith
as 2:2024cv04067
Petitioner:
Javier Pellecer
Respondent:
S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodgers v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Milton Melvin Rodgers
Respondent:
J. Hill and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Perez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Steven C. Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TerVeer v. Cuevas + the People et al
as 3:2024cv00847
Petitioner:
Justin TerVeer
Respondent:
Cuevas + the People and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
