Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 94,755
Foletti v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00542
Petitioner:
Fredrick D Foletti
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anthony Rivas v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 2:2024cv03231
Petitioner:
Anthony Rivas
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oelker v. Idaho State Bar (ISB) et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Petitioner:
Jeromy Oelker
Respondent:
Idaho State Bar (ISB), Director Diane Minnich and Attorney Thomas Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowley v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
Ryan Rowley
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Rogers v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
John William Rogers
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruce Haney v. L. Lundy
as 2:2024cv03159
Petitioner:
Bruce Haney
Respondent:
L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gildardo M. Pacheco v. Superior Court of Orange County
as 2:2024cv03152
Petitioner:
Gildardo M. Pacheco
Respondent:
Superior Court of Orange County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stratton v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00667
Petitioner:
Jaime Michelle Stratton and Jared Michael Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jupp v. Ferguson
as 2:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
Eugene Alec Jupp
Respondent:
Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
