Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 94,760
Rojas v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05281
Petitioner:
Francisco Salgado Rojas
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05284
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockett v. Matteson
as 5:2024cv02189
Petitioner:
Jamie Lockett
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. People of the State of California
as 4:2024cv02183
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Fay v. L.A. County Sheriffs Dept.
as 2:2024cv02974
Plaintiff:
John Fay
Defendant:
L.A. County Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
Heather L. Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Eastman v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01107
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Todd Eastman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erika Larae Williams v. Warden of Victorville Camp FCI Med I
as 5:2024cv00767
Petitioner:
Erika Larae Williams
Respondent:
Warden of Victorville Camp FCI Med I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Clark v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00645
Petitioner:
Robert Vincent Clark
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. State of Montana
as 1:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Joshua Dixon
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
