US District Court for the Northern District of California Labor Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 714
Abdul-Haqq v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv03727
Defendant:
Dennis Ramas, Bernard Tyson, Sonya Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Jamilah Abdul-Haqq
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Franco v. E-3 Systems.
as 4:2019cv02854
Plaintiff:
Jose Franco
Defendant:
E-3 Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deluna v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 5:2019cv02514
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Plaintiff:
Raul Deluna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nigam v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
as 5:2019cv02309
Plaintiff:
Sunita Nigam
Defendant:
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Anguiano v. Mann Packing Co., Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv02133
Plaintiff:
Maria Anguiano
Defendant:
Mann Packing Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
R. Alexander Acosta v. International Longshore and Warehouse Union
as 4:2019cv02103
Defendant:
International Longshore and Warehouse Union
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Hakeem v. National Express Transit Corporation et al
as 4:2019cv02023
Plaintiff:
Chauenga M Hakeem
Defendant:
National Express Transit Corporation and National Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caines v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Union Local 3299 et al
as 3:2019cv01856
Plaintiff:
David Caines
Defendant:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Union Local 3299 and California Public Employment Relations Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Huffman v. Pacific Gateway Concessions LLC
as 4:2019cv01791
Plaintiff:
Christopher Huffman
Defendant:
Pacific Gateway Concessions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Franco v. E-3 Systems
as 4:2019cv01453
Plaintiff:
Jose Franco
Defendant:
E-3 Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
